Wild duck? in English? It was interesting to read. But whatever we think about the story, why
Ibsen didn't kill the wild duck to make the happy end?
Then, only by that, everyone could be happy. Why the girl killed herself instead of this idea?
She couldn't endure who she was? Maybe.
People say, the man shouldn't reveal the truth. Yet, that happiness with lie looks like hypocrites too.
If the wife kept her secret, then, the family blood of the husband was ended totally. And the girl didn't realize the fact in her life? I don't think so. She half realized anyway and she must not be similar to father at all.
In this point, I think this kind of story is just the story. Right? The child doesn't have anything from father. Who can be cheated by this so easily?
Them? Right...
No comments:
Post a Comment